The concept of IOT is "bending over and waiting for the weather"
the concept of IOT has been gradually known to the public through media publicity and packaging since it was put forward. However, if you list the applications around in life, in addition to the traditional close access control, IC and the recently popular QR code, there are very few
looking at the main technologies of IOT today, most of them come from the original technologies in various fields, such as RFID, ZigBee, etc. as early as more than a decade ago, they have basically matured. They have integrated many technologies and changed their names. They are just old wine in new bottles. In itself, there is not much new
the smart xx series advocated by a group of people every day is either only heard of its voice or nothing new, but so far, no meaningful changes have been seen
Google launched Google project glass last month, which is refreshing. Not to mention advanced technology and all kinds of dazzling, but more importantly, practical. I remember a month ago, when I went to Shanghai to attend the electronics exhibition and home appliance exhibition, I saw the little swan's washing machine, the Android system running, which can hang and watch movies, and the propaganda point is intelligent IOT, but I really can't understand that the other designer himself will chat in front of the washing machine during the time of washing clothes? This is a representative of traditional industries. Following the trend of IOT, it has a relationship with rote, but it is so astringent, which is also an abnormal situation in the development of China IOT
Bill Gates is the first person on earth who wants to do IOT. In about 1995, Bill published his first book, the road to the future. The first person in China to put forward a similar idea should be the grand Chen Tianqiao grand box. Chen Tianqiao once imagined that such a box would be filled with games, videos, novels, e-books, and the whole family would sit together to play games. At that time, the bandwidth was too narrow, and the hardware could not meet the operating requirements. Such a great idea of Shanda box seemed to be untimely, and the concept was too advanced, so it was premature. Now, in the era of the popularity of intelligent devices, it is really the best time for the development of IOT, the grand digging well, People ran away before water was dug out of the well
then how can we call it real IOT and intelligence? The essential difference between IOT and Internet is led by Professor Yang zongkun, the former director of China Polyurethane Research Institute. Today's Internet is essentially the exchange of information and interpersonal interaction between people. This demand is centered on people, the interaction around people's brain and psychology, and the natural demand of human beings as social animals. The interconnection of objects is based on the needs of human life and production. There are many kinds of objects, and objects themselves do not have intelligence. At present, what we can do is only identity recognition, sensor acquisition and setting program execution. Take smart home as an example. Each household appliance needs to accurately grasp its own and on-site conditions, and the solution: check the oil tank before the zigzag experimental machine to see if there is enough oil and whether the oil pipe joint is firm, and then deal with it scientifically. This cannot be solved by simply installing several sensors and running several clock timing programs. At least, all household appliances need unified communication protocols and management means, so that human beings can easily use a terminal to operate, so the cost of smart home will be very high. Just the protocol standards and interfaces between various manufacturers are enough to wrangle. The real realization will take time
the future IOT is likely to rise from traditional industries such as manufacturing. Due to the limited variety of manufactured goods in the same enterprise and the relatively standardized manufacturing process, the application of IOT can really improve the production efficiency and management level of the enterprise. Take the industrial application of our company's production and manufacturing as an example. It assists enterprises to realize automatic work reporting and scientific material distribution. Through project deployment, it realizes the transparent management and material tracking of the whole process of vehicles from the first station to the delivery and inspection offline. It integrates the production site material storage and MES material distribution of each station, and through model calculation, it is accurate to each vehicle in each order, Scientifically distribute materials for each vehicle at each station, ensure that customized product parts are delivered to the designated station at the right time and with the right materials, and then prepare materials for the next station according to the manufacturing time of this station. The whole process is completely automated and designed according to customer needs, which is unprecedented in the industry
I think this is the direction of IOT's first implementation in the future. There is no too dazzling technology and packaging to provide customers with tangible efficiency improvements. In the development trend of object interconnection, the intelligence of enterprises, industries and objects themselves is the foundation, and then we can talk about the development of object interconnection between families and consumers
we should not blindly pursue high-tech, let alone copy mechanically for the purpose of project approval. Today, IOT did not achieve the expected high-speed development speed. The core problem is the insufficient demand excavation. Through the government's short-term stimulation of the market, it will only have the effect of pulling seedlings and encouraging them. The government's industrial support is like a Viagra. Without real demand foundation and business model, the projects approved will become Viagra eating boys. Just look at the various IOT projects led by local governments
as for the product manufacturing end of IOT, we can review the early PC experience. The obvious characteristics of the significant development of PC industry are: modular division of labor and global supply chain. Computers 30 years ago had many instruction sets, many CPUs, incompatible hardware, and many operating system platforms. Intel x86 and windows are just one of many options. PowerPC, alpha, MIPs Each operating system has its own modified Linux, and even windows has x86 and alpha versions. In addition, because the material is fragile, the samples will be treated simply during the experiment. Slowly, the industry has unified the supply chain: the core CPU is provided by Intel and AMD; The system is provided by Microsoft; Lenovo, Dell, HP, Haier and Shenzhou all use the same processor, the same configuration and the same operating system. This leads to the unification of experience
rfid industry has also slowly appeared in the same division of labor stage. Chips are provided by source RF, yingpinjie, arm and other enterprises, arm motherboard, Linux OS The division of labor in the industrial chain is clear, and those who adopt gb/t11144 standard methods and schemes to do CPU, RF chip and screen currently perform their respective duties. This will avoid a lot of repetitive work and unify the system and data format. The same interface, the same user experience. Finally, the gap between our products and foreign products will be smaller and smaller. We will copy the counter attack of computers and
although the technology of IOT today has gradually matured, large-scale applications still lack opportunities. Liu Bei once said that he should bend his body and keep his points in order to wait for the time of day, and should not compete with life. It will take time for IOT to be popularized on a large scale. Let's wait for the moment when the flowers bloom
Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI